4. Scientific Ontology: Integrating Naturalized Metaphysics and Voluntarist Epistemology (forthcoming 2017), Oxford University Press. [Abstract PDF]

3. ‘Ancient Skepticism, Voluntarism, and Science’, International Journal for the Study of Skepticism (2015). [Introduction PDF]

2. ‘Explanation, Inference, Testimony, and Truth: Essays Dedicated to the Memory of Peter Lipton’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (ed.) (2010). [Introduction PDF]

1. A Metaphysics for Scientific Realism: Knowing the Unobservable (2007), Cambridge University Press. [Abstract PDF]


35. ‘Last Thoughts on New Thinking about Scientific Realism’, Synthese (forthcoming).

34. ‘Acerca de la Relación entre el Realismo Científico y la Metafísica Científica’, in B. Borge & N. Gentile (eds.), Realismo Científico (forthcoming).

33. ‘Physics, Metaphysics, Dispositions, and Symmetries – à la French’, Erkenntnis (forthcoming).

32. ‘Realism, Antirealism, Epistemic Stances, and Voluntarism’, in J. Saatsi (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Scientific Realism, Routledge (forthcoming).

31. ‘Saving the Scientific Phenomena: What Powers Can and Cannot Do’, in J. D. Jacobs (ed.), Putting Powers to Work, Oxford University Press (forthcoming 2017). [PDF]

30. ‘Truth and the Sciences’, in M. Glanzberg (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Truth, Oxford University Press (forthcoming 2017). [PDF]

29. ‘Scientific Realism’ (version II: revised and updated), in E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (forthcoming 2017). [URL]

28. ‘What is Scientific Realism?’ (with Bas C. van Fraassen), Spontaneous Generations (forthcoming 2017).

27. ‘Case Studies, Selective Realism, and Historical Evidence’, in M. Massimi, J.-W. Romeign, & G. Schurz, EPSA15 Selected Papers, pp. 13-23, Springer (2017). [PDF]

26. ‘Particles, Causation, and the Metaphysics of Structure’, Synthese (2015): DOI: 10.1007/s11229-015-0913-z. [PDF]

25. ‘L’existence des lois: les pouvoirs causaux dans la nature’, in B. Feltz (ed.), La nature en éclats: Les défis d’un nouveau rapport la nature (2015), Academia. [PDF]

24. ‘Suspension of Belief and Epistemologies of Science’, International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 5 (2015): 168-192. [PDF]

23. ‘On the Prospects of Naturalized Metaphysics’, in D. Ross, J. Ladyman, & H. Kincaid (eds.), Scientific Metaphysics, pp. 27-50, Oxford University Press (2013). [PDF]

22. ‘Realism in the Desert and in the Jungle: Reply to French, Ghins, and Psillos’, Erkenntnis 78 (2013): 39-58. [PDF] (Related papers by French, Ghins, Psillos.)

21. ‘Dispositions for Scientific Realism’, in R. Groff & J. Greco (eds.), Powers and Capacities in Philosophy: The New Aristotelianism, pp. 113-127, Routledge (2013). [PDF]

20. ‘Selektywny sceptycyzm: realizm w stosunku do przedmiotów teoretycznych, realizm strukturalny, semirealizm’, Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia VII (2012): 163-191. [PDF]

19. ‘Ontological Priority: The Conceptual Basis of Non-Eliminative, Ontic Structural Realism’, in E. M. Landry & D. P. Rickles (eds.), Structural Realism: Structure, Object, and Causality (2012), Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, Springer. [PDF]

18. ‘Scientific Realism and Ontological Relativity’, The Monist 94 (2011): 157-180. [PDF]

17. ‘Scientific Realism’, in E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2011). [URL]

16. ‘A Puzzle about Voluntarism about Rational Epistemic Stances’, Synthese (2011) 178: 37-48. [PDF]

15. ‘Perspectivism, Inconsistent Models, and Contrastive Explanation’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (2010) 41: 405-412 (A4 column format). [PDF]

14. ‘Truth and Representation in Science: Two Inspirations from Art’, in R. Frigg & M. C. Hunter (eds.), Beyond Mimesis and Convention: Representation in Art and Science(2010), Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Springer. [PDF]

13. ‘Metaphysics Between the Sciences and Philosophies of Science’, in P. D. Magnus & J. Busch (eds.) New Waves in Philosophy of Science (2010), Palgrave Macmillan. [PDF]

12. ‘Informational versus Functional Theories of Scientific Representation’, Synthese (2009) 72: 197-213. [PDF]

11. ‘What You Don’t Know Can’t Hurt You: Realism and the Unconceived’, Philosophical Studies (2008) 137: 149-158. [PDF]

10. ‘Inessential Aristotle: Powers without Essences’, in R. Groff (ed.) Revitalizing Causality: Realism about Causality in Philosophy and Social Science (2008), Routledge. [PDF]

9. ‘Six Degrees of Speculation: Metaphysics in Empirical Contexts’, in B. Monton (ed.) Images of Empiricism (2007), Oxford University Press. [PDF]

8. ‘Causal Realism: Events and Processes’, Erkenntnis (2005) 63: 7-31. [PDF]

7. ‘Structuralism as a Form of Scientific Realism’, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science (2004) 18: 151-171. [PDF]

6. ‘Stance Relativism: Empiricism versus Metaphysics’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (2004) 35: 173-184. [PDF]

5. ‘The Structuralist Conception of Objects’, Philosophy of Science (2003) 70: 867-878. [PDF]

4. ‘The Dispositional Essentialist View of Properties and Laws’, International Journal of Philosophical Studies (2003) 11: 393-413. [PDF]

3. ‘The Semantic or Model-Theoretic View of Theories and Scientific Realism’, Synthese (2001) 127: 325-345. [PDF]

2. ‘Semirealism’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (1998) 29: 391-408. [PDF]

1. Irving, T. C., J. Dunnings, A. Chakravartty, and B. M. Millman, ‘The Effect of High pH and Crosslinking on the Filament Lattice of Vertebrate Striated Muscle’, Biophysical Journal (1988) 53: 565a.


8. Review of S. Mumford & R. L. Anjum, Getting Causes from Powers, in British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (2013): 895-899. [PDF]

7. Review of B. Ellis, The Metaphysics of Scientific Realism, in Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews (2010). [LINK]

6. Review of A. Bird, Nature’s Metaphysics: Laws and Properties, in Metascience (2009) 18: 75-79. [PDF]

5. Review of I. Niiniluoto, Critical Scientific Realism, in Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (2005) 69: 227-230. [PDF]

4. Review of E. Agazzi & M. Pauri (eds.), The Reality of the Unobservable: Observability, Unobservability and Their Impact on the Issue of Scientific Realism, in British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (2003) 54: 359-363. [PDF]

3. Review of N. Cartwright, The Dappled World: A Study in the Boundaries of Science, in Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (2003) 66: 244-247. [PDF]

2. Review of C. Norris, Quantum Theory and the Flight From Realism: Philosophical Responses to Quantum Mechanics, in Metascience (2001) 10: 483-487. [PDF]

1. Review of N. Maxwell, The Comprehensibility of the Universe: A New Conception of Science, in Times Higher Education Supplement (1999): 24 September.